According to some employees, her removal was not due to poor performance but quite the oppositeโ€”it resulted from efforts to implement stricter oversight and adherence to legal procedures in daily operations. Employees state that ฤŒule had previously insisted on consistent application of rules, especially regarding administrative processes such as vehicle registration and handling citizen requests. This approach, they claim, led to slower procedures and the discontinuation of earlier practices that were not fully compliant with the law. Internal reactions and public statements also mention serious allegations of possible irregularities within the service. Among other things, suspicions have been raised about abuses of official procedures, manipulation of documentation, and potentially unauthorized handling of registry data. Employees who spoke out assert that ฤŒule attempted to bring order through increased controls and initiating certain procedures against those responsible but did not receive the necessary support within the hierarchy for such moves. ฤŒule herself confirmed that she was relieved of her duties, emphasizing that she had always worked in accordance with the law and professional standards, and that such an approach may have been the reason for her removal. The entire case gains further weight due to the seriousness of the allegations, leading to expectations that competent institutions will thoroughly investigate the situation and determine whether there are elements of responsibility or possible illegalities in the work of Mostar's CIPS.