A citizen from Tirana reports an unusual case that, according to her, has cost her family the loss of a portion of their property. For more than a decade, she has been navigating through institutions without managing to recover around 100 square meters of land, which have turned out to be "missing" in the official documentation. Rudina Bylyku explains that everything started after the properties adjacent to her grandfather's were sold to a third party. This involves two properties, one owned by her son and the other by her grandfather's brother. After the purchase, the new owner requested their merger into a single property, but without completing the administrative process, he turned to the court. The court appointed a topographic expert to verify the property boundaries and determine the portion remaining under Rudina's family ownership. However, according to the report, the problem occurred precisely at this stage. In the expert report, the expert recognizes Ganiu as the boundary owner to the east, but in the accompanying sketch, his property is not shown at all. This discrepancy between the description and the map, according to the citizen, has led the cadastral institution to no longer recognize this property, transferring it to the name of the person who had purchased the adjacent properties. "I haven’t found a solution for 10 years," she states, adding that every attempt to clarify the situation has encountered obstacles and ambiguous responses from the responsible institutions. In a confrontation with the expert, the latter initially declared that it might be a "lapse," but later expressed that he does not remember what happened and no longer has the relevant documentation. At the same time, according to him, responsibility also falls on the mortgage institution that accepted the document. On the other hand, the expert's wife, who practices as a lawyer, admitted that there might have been an error in the document but raised questions about how this document was accepted by the institutions. She suggested that the citizen reapply to correct the situation. However, in a second meeting, the expert's stance changed, denying that it was his mistake. Meanwhile, his wife requested that the issue not be made public, stating: "There’s no need to bring us on television; let’s solve the problem." Today, after 10 years, the citizen continues to seek the return of her property, while the case raises serious questions about the accuracy of expert assessments and the responsibility of institutions in handling property documentation.